Problem 0

0.1:

A subgroup is a subset which is a group under the same operation. This could be and .

0.2

Kernel of a homomorphism is all such elements where for . An example of this would be multiples of 5 in def by

Problem 1

1.1

  1. Reflexive:
    1. This fails, as if we let x be 0 then . Thus this is not an equivalence relation.

1.2

  1. Reflectivity:
    1. , , . However we do not have it so so the first pair we need to add is
  2. Symmetry:
    1. however, does not imply so this pair would also need to be added. We could check transitivity, however we found all the needed pairs. So I would add and

Problem 2

2.1:

  1. Stack notation:
    1. we have that the permutation takes the following:
      1. 1 4
      2. 2 7
      3. 3 2
      4. 4 1
      5. 5 3
      6. 6 8
      7. 7 5
      8. 8 6
    2. The cyclic notion is:
      1. (14)(2753)(68)
        1. remember disjointed cycles commute
    3. Order: LCM(2,4,2)=4.
    4. (12345678)(87654321)
      1. also just any disjointed permutations, (1234)(5678) as contains all elements from

2.2

  1. All subgroups if a cyclic subgroup are cyclic. So we are looking at :
    1. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
    2. Now some of these subgroups are the same, note:
    3. I want to use the same logic as in All Ideals in integers mod n to state that it is devisiors and every group goes down to the gcd, so here we have:
    4. .
      1. Another way to think about this is the order of the subgroup must devide the parent group, which would make it only the following.

Problem 3

3.1

  1. Proof:
    1. Assume:
    2. Then notice:
    3. In the other direction assume is in the Kernel. Then,
    4. Specifically notice
    5. By performing on the right we see that
  2. Given solution. Wrote it out because its kinda interesting:

3.2

Things needed for a group:

  1. Identity:
    1. Closure is met as you cannot go outside by definition
    2. Identity: Clearly, you can define an isomorphism thus this works as the identity as its homomorphic and bijective.
    3. Associativity: is met through the composition of functions, as composition of functions is associative.
    4. Inverse: By definition isomorphism are reversible, thus for any isomorphism we can define its inverse as .

3.3

  1. means there are 2 cosets of in .
  2. This means there are only two cosets that partition , for
    1. and for the left
    2. and for the right cosets.
  3. as commutes, we know . so it follows as this is the only other coset that can exist.