Problem 0
0.1:
A subgroup is a subset which is a group under the same operation. This could be and .
0.2
Kernel of a homomorphism is all such elements where for . An example of this would be multiples of 5 in def by
Problem 1
1.1

- Reflexive:
- This fails, as if we let x be 0 then . Thus this is not an equivalence relation.
1.2

- Reflectivity:
- , , . However we do not have it so so the first pair we need to add is
- Symmetry:
- however, does not imply so this pair would also need to be added. We could check transitivity, however we found all the needed pairs. So I would add and
Problem 2
2.1:

- Stack notation:
- we have that the permutation takes the following:
- 1 → 4
- 2 → 7
- 3 → 2
- 4 → 1
- 5 → 3
- 6 → 8
- 7 → 5
- 8 → 6
- The cyclic notion is:
- (14)(2753)(68)
- remember disjointed cycles commute
- (14)(2753)(68)
- Order: LCM(2,4,2)=4.
- (12345678)(87654321)
- also just any disjointed permutations, (1234)(5678) as contains all elements from
- we have that the permutation takes the following:
2.2

- All subgroups if a cyclic subgroup are cyclic. So we are looking at :
- ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
- Now some of these subgroups are the same, note:
- I want to use the same logic as in All Ideals in integers mod n to state that it is devisiors and every group goes down to the gcd, so here we have:
- .
- Another way to think about this is the order of the subgroup must devide the parent group, which would make it only the following.
Problem 3
3.1

- Proof:
- Assume:
- Then notice:
- In the other direction assume is in the Kernel. Then,
- Specifically notice
- By performing on the right we see that
- Given solution. Wrote it out because its kinda interesting:
3.2
Things needed for a group:
- Identity:
- Closure is met as you cannot go outside by definition
- Identity: Clearly, you can define an isomorphism thus this works as the identity as its homomorphic and bijective.
- Associativity: is met through the composition of functions, as composition of functions is associative.
- Inverse: By definition isomorphism are reversible, thus for any isomorphism we can define its inverse as .
3.3

- means there are 2 cosets of in .
- This means there are only two cosets that partition , for
- and for the left
- and for the right cosets.
- as commutes, we know . so it follows as this is the only other coset that can exist.